National Journal.com

nationaljournal.com > Expert Blogs > National Security

NationalJournal.com Home National Security Experts Home National Security Home

National Journal's National Security

Contributor

Col. Douglas Macgregor, (U.S. Army, ret.), Lead Partner, Potomac League, LLC

Related Link: http://douglasmacgregor.com/

Biography provided by participant

Douglas A. Macgregor is an independent defense and foreign policy consultant with the firm, Glenside Analysis, Inc., based in Ashburn, Virginia. He is also a retired Colonel who left the Army on 1 June 2004 after 28 years of service, most of which was spent in armor, mechanized infantry and armored cavalry formations. Macgregor was commissioned in the US Army in 1976 after one year at the Virginia Military Institute and four years at West Point. On completion of airborne and ranger training, Macgregor served in a variety of command and staff assignments.

In 1991, Macgregor was awarded the bronze star with "V" device for valor for his leadership of combat troops in the 2nd Squadron, 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment, the lead element of the VII Corps during the advance into Iraq of February 1991. Colonel Macgregor's crowning achievement in Desert Storm was his personal leadership of the two cavalry troops from 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment that destroyed a full-strength Republican Guard Brigade in less than 30 minutes on 26 February 1991, that became known as the Battle of the 73 Easting.

After the Gulf War, from June 1992 to July 1994, Colonel Macgregor commanded the 1st Squadron, 4th Cavalry in the 1st Infantry Division (mechanized) at Fort Riley, KS. In November 1993, Colonel Macgregor's cavalry squadron decisively defeated the Opposing Force of the National Training Center in four major battles that became the focus of a 1994-1005 RAND study on high performance units. His unit was identified as the high performance unit in this study of over 40 rotations since the first Gulf War. His unit's remarkable accomplishments included the one and only action in the history of the National Training Center during which the Opposing Force was totally annihilated. The squadron's performance has not been equaled since November 1993.

After serving for a year as the Director of the Battle Command Battle Laboratory at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, where he was involved in the early phase of the Force XXI digitization initiatives, Macgregor was assigned to Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) in November 1997 as the J5, Director of Strategic Planning for the Balkans. During this period he was responsible for the strategic planning that led to the Kosovo Air Campaign. In October 1998, Macgregor became the Director of the Joint Operations Center at SHAPE where he supervised the conduct and planning of operations with a staff of 240 officers and noncommissioned officers from 19 NATO nations throughout the Kosovo Crisis until January 2000.

In addition to his latest work Transformation Under Fire (published by Praeger, 2003), Colonel Macgregor is the author of two other books, Breaking the Phalanx: A New Design for Landpower in the 21st Century, (published by Praeger, 1997), and The Soviet-East German Military Alliance, (published by Cambridge University Press, 1989). His work has been featured in numerous publications, including the Washington Post, the New Yorker, Stars & Stripes, Newsweek, and the Army Times. He has also appeared on the Lehrer News Hour and ABC World News Tonight as a commentator on current military operations in Iraq.

Recent Responses

September 28, 2009 02:58 PM

RE: Obama's Afghan Dilemma: Go Big Or Go Home?

This was published by Douglas MacGregor on September 28, 2009 in the publication Defense News. http://www.defensenews.com Illusions of Victory There’s No Strategy To Win in Afghanistan By DOUGLAS MACGREGOR Douglas MacArthur is regarded as a great commander because he got some very important things right, most famously the Inchon landing. He also got some things wrong, such as his push to the Yalu River. His catchy statement, “there is no substitute for victory,” was also wrong, though not so wrong as the armchair strategists who quote it out of context. In fact, “victory” is often an illusion, a will-o’-the-wisp that…  Read more

August 17, 2009 10:41 AM

RE: Containment Succeeded, Pre-emption Failed -- Time For A New National Strategy?

To me this short clip sums up the utter foolishness of our current military commitment. If Afghanistan really mattered, we would use fuel air explosive to annihilate the opposition in the hard to reach areas. But we know it’s not. There is no existential threat to us in Afghanistan any more than there was in Iraq. So, we put good Americans like Sergeant McHugh in harm’s way for absolutely nothing. As a light infantryman, the only thing he can do is dig in, sit under fire and call for air and artillery support. This is precisely the sort of positional…  Read more

April 6, 2009 03:11 PM

RE: Can Gates Fix The Pentagon Procurement Mess?

In the absence of any fundamentally new military strategy, you get confusion. Here is my quick assessment. -     FCS should go away, but since Gates may not think he can cancel it, he is restructuring it to satisfy BAE and GDLS needs to produce some armored vehicles. Unclear what the spin offs are he is talking about. Virtually all of the sensor technology and robots are already in use today in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sadly, no mention of reducing existing inventories of unneeded Army and Marine junk. No mention of rapid prototyping as an alternative to the current industrial age…  Read more

March 30, 2009 07:51 AM

RE: NATO At 60: Birthday Party Or Funeral?

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has not only survived well beyond the demise of the Soviet State and the Warsaw Pact, it's also seemingly flourished despite the absence of a unifying threat to its members. Yet appearances are deceiving. To force cohesion on an alliance without an existential threat, American national strategy after 1991 turned to sanctions, no-fly zones, periodic strikes in Iraq, missile strikes into Afghanistan and Sudan, and an anti-Serb intervention in Bosnia, until it reached its highpoint in the air war against Serbia in Kosovo. European reactions to these operations were very mixed, but with the disastrous…  Read more

December 16, 2008 10:06 AM

RE: The Obama Withdrawal From Iraq: How Fast?

The United States needs to get out of Iraq. America’s approach to the social, political and economic transformation of Iraq through military occupation whether through the use of violence or cash payments for cooperation is illogical and unsupportable. It is altruistic imperialism, or benevolent territorial imperialism, a condition under which Americans in uniform seek to impose American concepts of governance in a cultural setting where these concepts are unworkable, if not completely irrelevant. Ultimately, for reasons of finance and an acute lack of domestic political support the United States Government must eventually walk away from Iraq allowing it to devolve…  Read more

December 8, 2008 08:47 AM

RE: How Will Obama First Be Tested?

President-elect Obama faces the greatest American and global economic crisis since 1929, and he must give priority to America’s economic recovery. Comments by Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee's emerging threats and capabilities subcommittee made on the November 30 edition of "This Week" on ABC reinforce the notion that the president-elect would prefer to consign the conduct of foreign and defense policy to others while focuses on the economy. Reed said President-elect Obama’s defense advisors were looking for a deputy secretary of defense who could make, “the trains run on time” inside the Pentagon rather…  Read more
Advertisement
Advertisement

Stay Connected

Archives

Contributors

Add National Security Experts To Your Site

Blogs

Experts

Experts: Economy

A BRAC For The Budget

Latest response: James K. GalbraithNovember 06, 2009 6:37 pm
Experts: Education

Are Turnarounds A Losing Strategy?

Latest response: Steve PehaNovember 06, 2009 3:39 pm
Experts: Health Care

The Affordability Factor

Latest response: Karen DavisNovember 03, 2009 12:18 pm