Question? Call us at 800-207-8001 | Sign In | Learn About Membership

Friday, May 24, 2013 | Last Updated: January 11, 2013 10:15 AM

National Security Experts
«How Should the U.S. Respond to Egypt Elections? | Main page

Iran, Oil, and the Politics of Sanctions

By Amy Harder and Sara Sorcher
July 2, 2012 | 6:00 a.m.
  • 1

How could the Iran sanctions affect global oil prices and, consequently, gasoline prices in the United States?

The financial sanctions on Iran officially kicked in last week, and energy economists aren't yet certain about their impact. But what is clear is that oil prices are falling globally from their high in April--in part thanks to increased production from Saudi Arabia. Some lawmakers are starting to talk about imposing a second round of sanctions if Iran continues to resist scrutiny of its nuclear program.

What factors should the Obama administration and other countries consider when imposing sanctions? What other actions, such as tapping into the nation's strategic oil reserves, could the administration take to blunt the possibility of high oil prices? Is the administration doing enough at home to wean the country off foreign oil?

The administration recently exempted certain countries from sanctions because they significantly reduced the volume of crude-oil imports from Iran. Do you see the exemptions as a demonstration of the sanctions' effectiveness? Or do you agree with those lawmakers who have criticized the exemption, in particular to China, as giving a "free pass" to those who help Iran's economy? If these countries can't further reduce their oil purchases from Iran in the next six months, and become subject to U.S. sanctions, how would this strategy impact foreign policy?

Leave a response

1 Response

Expand all comments Collapse all comments

July 2, 2012 12:57 PM

FAITH, HOPE & HUBRIS

By Michael Brenner

Professor of International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh

The intricacies of commodity pricing on the international oil market has best be left to those who give the matter constant attention. So I offer only one comment. Based on what we learned from the crises of the 1970s (and 1980s) the characteristic inelasticty of demand in response to price changes, and the inelasticty of supply in response to short term price or demand fluctuations, those inelasticities are most apparent when there are severe changes in supply/demand ratios beyond what we are seeing now.

On to politics. Most important, it should be obvious by now that the Islamic Republic will not surrender or crumble because of the economic sanctions. This is true no matter how many quotes from the man in the Tehran street about economic distress are passed off by the MSM as the final word on the country's political future. This manufactured optimism is classic avoidance behavior - intellectually and in policy terms. We refuse to face up to the reality that we either attack and probably invade Iran or we deal with the leadership realistically on Realpolitik terms that a...

The intricacies of commodity pricing on the international oil market has best be left to those who give the matter constant attention. So I offer only one comment. Based on what we learned from the crises of the 1970s (and 1980s) the characteristic inelasticty of demand in response to price changes, and the inelasticty of supply in response to short term price or demand fluctuations, those inelasticities are most apparent when there are severe changes in supply/demand ratios beyond what we are seeing now.

On to politics. Most important, it should be obvious by now that the Islamic Republic will not surrender or crumble because of the economic sanctions. This is true no matter how many quotes from the man in the Tehran street about economic distress are passed off by the MSM as the final word on the country's political future. This manufactured optimism is classic avoidance behavior - intellectually and in policy terms. We refuse to face up to the reality that we either attack and probably invade Iran or we deal with the leadership realistically on Realpolitik terms that acknowledge their legitimate security interests.

In addition, commentators fail to note that Washington's policies of punishing third parties for trading with Iran are specifically forbidden by the World Trade Organization treaty to which we are a signatory. Sooner or later, we will be hauled before one of their dispute panels and found in violation of our legal obligations. That takes time, though. So I guess the administration's hope is that Iran will bend the knee well beforehand.

In a longer time perspective, most striking is discrepancy between Washington's hubris that it still can dictate to the world what others should or should not do, on the one hand, and our slide down the influence curve, in the other. China, and most others, are acutely aware of this. So rather than challenge us directly now, they will go through the motions of compliance - so long as they have found ways not to do themselves economic damage. Why pick a fight, when we are exhausting ourselves throwing punches non stop in every direction and about to totter from our own vain exertions.

It is long overdo that we discuss these realities maturely. Instead, we're like the character in the roadrunner cartoon who has veered off the cliff but has yet to anticipate the imminent descent as momentum keeps us flapping our wings.

Read More

Print |
Share | E-mail

Leave a response

 

Archives
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
Contributors
  • Richard Aboulafia
  • David Abshire
  • Gordon Adams
  • Adm. Thad Allen
  • Norman R. Augustine
  • Robert Baer
  • Courtney Banks
  • Milt Bearden
  • Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo.
  • Michael Brenner
  • Michael Brown
  • Daniel Byman
  • Lt. Gen. John H. Campbell
  • Vincent Cannistraro
  • James Jay Carafano
  • Joseph Cirincione
  • Patrick Clawson
  • Joseph J. Collins
  • Wolfgang H. Demisch
  • Paul D. Eaton
  • Rep. Eliot Engel, D-NY
  • Eric Farnsworth
  • Lt. Gen. Jay M. Garner
  • Bonnie Glaser
  • Daniel Gouré
  • Lee Hamilton
  • Col. Thomas X. Hammes
  • Lori Handrahan
  • Shane Harris
  • Corine Hegland
  • Kathleen Hicks
  • Bruce Hoffman
  • John Isaacs
  • James R. Locher III
  • Michael P. Jackson
  • Brian Michael Jenkins
  • Josef Joffe
  • C. Stewart Verdery, Jr.
  • Col. Robert Killebrew
  • Larry C. Kindsvater
  • James Kitfield
  • Rachel Kleinfeld
  • Dick Kohn
  • Larry Korb
  • Steven Kosiak
  • Andy Krepinevich
  • David Krieger
  • Col. W. Patrick Lang
  • Hillary Mann Leverett
  • James Lewis
  • Samuel Logan
  • Col. Douglas Macgregor
  • James Mann
  • Ron Marks
  • Gen. Barry McCaffrey
  • Kellie A. Meiman
  • Steven Metz
  • Maj. Gen. William L. Nash
  • Stewart Patrick
  • Jim Phillips
  • Paul R. Pillar
  • Norman Polmar
  • Christopher Preble
  • Jack Pritchard
  • Eberhard Sandschneider
  • Maj. Gen. Robert Scales
  • Kori Schake
  • Michael F. Scheuer
  • Michael Schiffer
  • Liz Schrayer
  • Chris Seiple
  • Daniel Serwer
  • Richard Hart Sinnreich
  • Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo.
  • Henry D. Sokolski
  • Baker Spring
  • Paul Starobin
  • Paul Sullivan
  • Bruno Tertrais
  • Loren Thompson
  • Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas
  • Michael Vlahos
  • Amb. Kurt Volker
  • George Ward
  • Bing West
  • Winslow T. Wheeler
  • Wayne White
  • Joel Wit
  • Sam Worthington
  • Dov S. Zakheim
  • Amy Zegart
  • Gen. Anthony C. Zinni

 

The “agree” function has been temporarily disabled from the blog while we transition to a new system. The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

NationalJournal Magazine | NationalJournal Daily | Hotline | Almanac | NationalJournal Live
About | Contact Us | Press Room | Staff Bios | Jobs | Reprints & Back Issues | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Atlantic Media Company | Government Executive | The Atlantic | Quartz
Copyright © 2013 by National Journal Group Inc.
Powered by the Parse.ly Publisher Platform (P3).